I can honestly say that despite this being my third time
reading Sacred Gifts, Profane Pleasures
(that does not mean you assign it too much Dr. Bristol!), that I am still
picking up some new appreciation for it each time. Perhaps it is the writing style or as Susan
pointed out, the way that Marcy Norton manages to draw away from the
Eurocentric view of most commodities and instead focuses on how the Latin
American usage was much more influential in these two commodities than in
others. For my part I believe I readily
enjoyed that this book focuses on the evolving nature of European acceptance of
both chocolate and tobacco. Showing how
it wasn’t simply the elites attempting to use the good, but the interplay
between Church, State, Market, and Demand as to the evolving fate of the
commodities. Once more I appreciate the
induction of the Portuguese merchant clans into the narrative and the interplay
between the recently converted Jewish merchants with the fears of the Spanish
Catholic Church. While the various
factions vied for what to do with the commodities, this narrative comes off as
a tale of many people with the two commodities as the vehicle to tell that
tale. I would be hard pressed to say who
has the most agency in this book, but calling back to Robbins’ article that we
read at the beginning of the semester, I would personally say that Sacred Gifts, Profane Pleasures, does
not fall into his “capitalism cheerleader” camp, but rather presents a story of
two commodities from the New World being integrated by hook or by crook into
the Old.
No comments:
Post a Comment