Now, Jumping the shark may be a bit of an over simplification, but...
While reviewing this examination of Mexico’s role in the
development of pharmaceuticals, Gabriela Soto Laveaga’s book Jungle Labs, I
could not help but think of the “Jumping the Shark” metaphor for this industry.
Here we have an industry that is producing, and creating a lifestyle for its
laborers, in a global market with the workers and students urging the
government assistance in developing protections for the indigenous industry and
when the goverment steps in the industry growth curve displays a rapid incline and
an equally rapid decline, no matter what the state run industry did it was
unable to prevent other players in the industry from producing a synthetic
product and render the Mexican production irrelevant. Akin to Fonzy jumping the
shark (do I need to explain this for you youngsters?); not even he could save "Happy Days".
I think Carol’s statement regarding companies that
continually work to thwart monopolies is ultimately what brought in the rapid
decline. But, I also believe that the protectionist maneuvering by Echeverria,
using exploitation of peasants as a reason to nationalize the steroid industry may have
also been a factor. And, prevented Mexico from realizing its desire to rid the
nation of its dependency on foreign pharmaceutical companies.
Interesting parallel or contrast; when it was attempted to
domesticate the tuber they were not able to obtain the high yield of dioscoreas
they could get from the wild variation.
This is in contrast to cochineal; the farmers successfully developed a
higher quality domesticated or cultivated variety then the wild variation.
Overall the Laveaga has provided a perspective on the
development of steroids I had not considered previously. As Kirsten points out
in her post the laborers were not exploited and were able to elevate their
station in their society through hard work.
No comments:
Post a Comment