Sweetness and Power:
The Place of Sugar in Modern History.
Sidney W. Mintz
This covers the evolution and commoditization of Sucrose and
its derivatives as well as how it has spread through societies, caused the
enslavement of many people, enriched many merchants and invaded many aspects of
life.
I am a little hung-up on the idea of labor as a commodity. With
Mintz’s introduction and in his chapter on production he has only added fuel to
my fire. Mintz notes in the introduction that the plantations brought in “vast
numbers of people in chains” and that some of the people if not slaves were
people that only had labor to sell. He
goes on to note that free and enslaved people were used in the Canary Island
production of sugar and that there were plantations that had as many as 500
slaves. Though the enslaved people or those trading labor for a price did not
reap the full benefit of the commodity they produced their labor certainly had
an economic value to the producer of the sugar.
If, as we have discussed in class, a commodity can have a
life span, and it simply needs to be something that provides economic value
that someone is willing to pay for, then I believe that labor can be a
commodity. Furthermore, today’s industry
refers to its work force as Human Capitol;
that sounds like something with an economic value.
Moving on, Mintz also brings up the fragility of the capitol
markets, the fluctuation in the value of a commodity, and how speculation in
the value of the commodity of sugar caused investors to profit millions of
dollars and others to lose millions of dollars during the 1919-1920 Dance of Millions. Another point he noted regarding production that I found interesting was that the main reason
production increased was not due to an increase in crop yield but improved
processing methods and by acquiring more land cultivate the crop.
Prior to reading this book I never considered the origin of
sugar or how it became a staple in the US diet; it just always seemed to be
there. Another thing that I find intriguing is how the use and fondness for
sugar spread. Explorers/military forces
either visited/invaded places that had it and brought it home or nations were
evaded and the soldiers brought it with them.
Scott,
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely! I too am hung up on labor as a commodity. Which is why I am continuing to work through Marx again. I am also hung up on the manipulation of markets, not necessarily the fragility. Or maybe that is where you are going with your thoughts.
Thanks so much for this post. made me thing, and also nice to have a meeting of the minds.