What are the
lessons or themes we can take from The
True History of Chocolate? The Coes’
history is filled with facts about a period over three thousand five hundred
years long. There is so much history it
is difficult to see patterns that might apply more generally to other
commodities. For a person unfamiliar
with Latin American history the Coes provide a brief summary of the original inhabitants.
We learn about Olmec, Maya, Toltec and
Aztec people who successively dominated pre-Columbian Central America and
Mexico. Probably the Olmec’s first
processed cacao to make chocolate drinks.
After the Spanish forcefully colonized the native inhabitants, Spaniards
learned that chocolate had great value. Initially they rejected the taste of the
highly spiced chocolate drink the Aztecs favored, but as wealth-seekers they
were able to recognize the value of the commodity that served as a medium of
exchange, and eventually the Spanish acquired a liking for the taste of
chocolate.
One theme is
related to the different valuations people place on items or commodities. Appadurai and Kopytoff discussed how people’s
perceptions of things can change over time, and how items have biographies that
reveal much about the people who use them.
Commodities are given cultural value by people. Commodities are often first controlled by
social elites as a way to demonstrate their personal status. After some period of time commodities cease
to be the exclusive prerogative of elites, and other social groups are allowed
to enjoy them. Just as chocolate was the
drink of elites in Central America and Mexico, when it was introduced to
Europe, it became an item for the wealthy.
The cost of transportation, the duties imposed by the Spanish state, and
the limited quantities of chocolate in early shipments all contributed to the
price and special status of the good.
Spanish aristocrats developed ritual behaviors related to the consumption
of chocolate, special occasions where it was consumed with a select group of
people, and with carefully crafted accoutrements: chocolate pots, cups, and
saucers. Rituals reinforce
demonstrations of secular and religious authority. There is a link between the use of chocolate
in Aztec religious ceremonies and the chocolate parties given by those who
hoped to influence the government of Spain.
Copper grave
goods at Varna were associated with an elite group, but eventually copper
became a commodity fashioned into a variety of useful items used widely throughout
the community. After copper had been
commoditized, the elite found other ways to express their status and
power. Chocolate also became a substance
that common people could enjoy by the end of the nineteenth century. In this and other ways the spread of
chocolate resembled the history of sugar.
Harvesting the cacao beans was labor-intensive as was harvesting sugar
cane. Mechanization of chocolate
production did not come about until Milton Hershey adopted the practices of
Henry Ford and applied them to chocolate manufacture in the early twentieth
century. The commoditization of sugar was
associated with increased supply and reduced price. Dutch traders offered chocolate producers a
lucrative alternative to selling their product to Spanish distributors where
the government tax was imposed. Once the
European demand for chocolate was established, enterprising Europeans took
chocolate plants to Africa, Sri Lanka, and Indonesia. Spain protected its interests by taking
chocolate plants to the Philippines.
Where sucrose from sugar cane faced competition from sucrose from sugar
beets, high quality criollo chocolate
faced competition from the inferior but much hardier forestero chocolate, the type of chocolate planted around the
world. European consumers did not appear
to mind the reduction in quality, but by then chocolate was mixed with large
amounts of sugar which altered its taste, and the elite could satisfy their
needs with expensive specialty chocolate from criollo plants.
New
commodities must be incorporated into existing cultural practices and social
structures. Europeans incorporated
chocolate into the Galenic humoral system that was the foundation of their
understanding of how their bodies functioned and contemporary medical practice. Good health was a result of achieving balance
among the body’s humors. For those who
enjoyed drinking chocolate the humor assigned to it was positive, but different
opinions existed, not everyone agreed.
Another challenge was to determine how chocolate fit into the Catholic
practice of fasting before taking the sacraments. Liquids were accepted during the fast, but
food was prohibited. Many members of the
Catholic clergy enjoyed drinking chocolate, at least the wealthy ones, and they
had to decide if their practices maintained or broke the fast. Chocolate was often defended as a substance
that gave people energy and stamina. It
appears that a substance that provided calories could be determined not to
break a fast just because it was a drink rather than solid food. The illogic of that thought process is a
modern distinction that was not part of contemporary thought. Again we can contrast cultures when we
compare the use of cacao in Aztec religious rituals and the way Catholics determined
that their religious practices could accommodate their new fondness for
drinking chocolate.
Hi, Carol. You note "Just as chocolate was the drink of elites in Central America and Mexico, when it was introduced to Europe, it became an item for the wealthy," and that the Spanish associated many ritual implements (special pots, saucers, etc...)with its consumption. But I think it's also important to note that while chocolate was the drink of elites in the Old World and the New, it was so for different reasons. We can't ignore that the Aztec "puritan streak" as the Coes call it, limited its consumption even for the elites. And the association of chocolate with blood in human sacrifices meant that it existed in a unique spiritual niche. Contrastingly, in Europe chocolate was stripped of its spiritual meaning and imbued with the symbolism of base wealth and power solely in order to maintain the ancien regimes of European countries.
ReplyDelete